Skip navigation.
Home

Lighting a fire for public radio in Santa Barbara

Where are you going to go for live information when a life-threatening wildfire bears down on your town?

That was the question on the table over dinner the other night. The person asking it was my friend Michael, a botanist, a founding figure in Santa Barbara County's wine industry, and an observer of wildfires since 1964, when he helped fight the Coyote Fire and evacuate residents from its path. His last experience was in 1990, his own home was spared destruction by the Painted Cave fire by a fortunate shift in the sea breeze. Between those experiential bookends he also witnessed the Romero Fire of 1971, the Sycamore Fire of 1977, and the Wheeler Fire of 1985.

So he knew what it meant two Saturdays ago, when he saw dense brown smoke coming from what appeared to be Mission Canyon. Within five minutes he saw ash raining on the beach. Naturally, he turned on the radio. There was nothing. Not on the local news station. Not the local talk stations. Not any of the music, sports, Spanish and religious stations that pack the rest of the dial. He checked on local TV, and found nothing there. He got on the Web, checked with the Santa Barbara City and County fire departments, and InciWeb, which is the Official Source for wildfire information. There was nothing on any of them.

So he got in his car and drove up to Mission Canyon. "I did not stop at the Fire station in Mission canyon", he told me, "but saw all of the persons gathered there. The security person at the Botanic Garden had a police scanner which reported, in most in-explicit scannerese, that there was fire activity near Paradise. From the Garden it was clear, at least, that the fire was not in lower Mission Canyon. Nothing else was clear.

Paradise is the name of the valley on the far side of the Santa Ynez Mountains — a ridge of wooded sandstone forms the picturesque background for the Santa Barbara. By air Paradise Valley is only about four miles from Mission Canyon.

The fire was named Rancho, and we lucked out with it. The site was on the north side of the Santa Ynez river, where it was contained within two days and put out within five. While it only burned a few hundred acres, it still took hundreds of fire fighting personnel working with hand tools, tractors and air tankers, to put it out.

What would have happened if the fire had started on the south side of the river? If winds pressed it up the slope and toward Santa Barbara, it would have been almost impossible to contain short of the ridge line — if it could have been stopped at all.

That's because wildfires don't just spread along the ground. Moving through thick "fuel" (that's what they call dry vegetation, including the wood in your house), they are volcanos that launch burning debris hundreds of feet into the air, and shower fire hundreds or thousands of feet downwind. The Painted Cave Fire started around 6:00pm near the intersection of Painted Cave Road and Highway 154. Pushed southward by strong winds, the fire quickly spread down into Santa Barbara. By 7:15pm the fire was in Tucker's Grove and Camino del Rio, and hundreds of houses were burning. By morning it had jumped Highway 101 and advancing toward the sea.

Bear in mind that a freeway like 101 is considered a firebreak. But the biggest fires can easily leap highways, or even lakes. The Oakland fire of 1991 spread from Hiller Highlands to the Piedmont section of Oakland by leaping over highways 24 and 13, plus Lake Temescal. More than three thousand homes burned in that fire. The neighborhoods burned looked very much like those of the Riviera, Mission Canyon and other hilly parts of Santa Barbara.

The Painted Cave Fire spread across 101 and all the way to the south side of Modoc Road before it was turned back by shifting winds. It burned 641 structures. The Sycamore Fire took out 234 structures from Rivera east across Barker Pass. The Coyote Fire destroyed mansions in Montecito, artist enclaves along Mountain Road, and then and advanced up the slope, burned across the Santa Ynez Mountains and Paradise Valley on its way back into the San Rafael Wilderness. The mountains were turned black as more than 40,000 acres were consumed. The Romero Fire burned nearly everything north of East Valley Road in Montecito. According to the Montecito Fire Department, 1,042 structures were burned in those four fires. Twelve lives were lost, eleven of them firefighters.

Here is the Montecito Fire Department's burn map for large fires since 1960:

Here's how Sycamore Canyon looked, after the fire in 1977. See how large an area that covered. Then look back at the burn map to get some perspective on how large the burn perimeters can get.

Winds were low near the Rancho Fire when it started: only about 3 miles per hour. But up at the ridge winds were much higher. From my vantage at a ranch about 10 miles west I could see smoke billow upward like a mushroom cloud, then hit southbound winds at about 3000 feet — the rough height of the ridge itself. From there the smoke unfurled like a banner, straight across Santa Barbara. Here is one photo in the series I shot from that ranch:

That shot was taken at about 6:30pm. The fire was first reported about an hour earlier. By 9:00pm, the wind where I stood taking those pictures had reached near-gale force, straight out of the North. Fortunately, the fire was contained by then.

But what about next time? How soon will that be?

Well, we have had eight major fires since 1955, and that doesn't count the Rancho Fire last week, the Day Fire that burned through the Sespe Wilderness during all of last September, the Zaca Fire going on now (in Santa Barbara County) or any number of smaller fires we were lucky didn't make bigger news. The seventeen years that have passed since Painted Cave is a modern record. This year is one of the driest ever. We are more than overdue for another Big One.

So, Michael asked over dinner, What can we do to fix the radio problem? He directed the question at me, pointedly, because I had brought up that subject twice in the last few months, in blog posts titled Let's bring local public radio to Santa Barbara and Local Radio Chessboard. He believes — as do I — that radio is the only practical way to keep the largest number of citizens informed in the event of a fire. Since commercial radio can't find a way to keep the public informed on a live up-to-the-minute basis, the only choice facing the public is to create a station of their own.

And he was emphatic about giving me this assignment. Having an active, live, engaged public radio station will not only install a long-overdue fixture in Santa Barbara's cultural landscape; it will save lives and homes.

As it happens (and as I explained in those two last links), there is a fortunate combination of opportunities in front of us right now. Here they are:

  1. Commercial radio owners are shedding stations. Big companies like Clear Channel are selling stations off, especially in smaller markets. (Clear Channel reportedly sold its Santa Barbara stations, but FCC databases say they're still in the hands of Clear Channel subsidiary Citicaster Licenses, L.P. — even though KTMS's website shows the owner as Rincon Broadcasting.) Compared to a few years ago — or even to the price of a home in Santa Barbara today — radio stations come cheap. KZSB/1290, "The News-Press Radio Station," was purchased two years ago for just $750,000 by a friend of News-Press publisher Wendy McCaw. It's small and it's on AM, but its signal covers town very nicely. One source tells me that KTMS/990 is not only for sale, but that a likely buyer is Westinghouse/CBS, which would bulldoze the signal to make room for enlarging the signal of KFWB/980, one of its stations in Los Angeles. (I last wrote about that here).
  2. There are pioneering efforts we might build on. KCBX is a San Luis Obispo station that serves Santa Barbara through KSBX, which has a 50-watt transmitter on Gibraltar Peak. There is no local programming so far, but there could be. KCLU is a Thousand Oaks station has won awards for its news efforts and goes out of its way to serve Santa Barbara, even though its local signal on 102.3 comes from a 4 (yes, four) watt "translator" on Gibraltar Peak. It does a pretty good job, considering. KDB is also worth mentioning, since it thrives through public and private efforts to extend its legacy as one of the nation's longest-standing classical music stations. While KDB is a commercial radio station, it is operated by the nonprofit Santa Barbara foundation, which itself has a 78-year history as a landmark institution — and perhaps might have an interest in a public radio counterpart to KDB.
  3. There is an organized and funded effort to bring local public radio to cities that currently lack it. As it happens, Santa Barbara is the largest city in the U.S. that combines the presence of a major university with the absence of a local public radio station. Public Radio Capital is a nonprofit created to help buy, improve or build new public radio stations, and it is paying close attention to Santa Barbara. I've met with some of its officials, and I can report that they interested in helping us — provided we are ready to help ourselves.
  4. There may be openings for new stations. The FCC has announced a filing window for new station licenses between October 12 and 19 of this year. Could be there's enough wiggle room to squeeze a new signal into Santa Barbara.
  5. There is an abundance of ready talent. The Citizen Media movement — blogging, podcasting, videoblogging, online news reporting and much more — has grown enormously in recent years, especially here in Santa Barbara. The diaspora of former reporters and photographers from the Santa Barbara News-Press has enlarged the pool of talent working online at the Independent, The Santa Barbara Newsroom and elsewhere. Edhat has been honored as one of the top ten "placeblogs" in the country. Other blogs, such as Craig Smith's, Blogabarbara and my own, comprise a kind of public op-ed section that occasionally reports hard news as well. Between these folks and other interested citizens — including students and faculty at our many local educational institutions — there should be plenty of talent and energy to gather around a new public radio project.
  6. There is no limit to what can be done online as well. Because the Internet has few limits on broadcasting and publishing news and public affairs, we don't have to wait for a channel to start building a station. We also don't have to limit ourselves to a single "channel" for streaming programming. We can also archive everything we broadcast so it's all available to listeners as podcasts. The possibilities are wide open here.

So I'd like to gauge people's interest in putting a station on the air. You can write me (doc AT searls dot com) or post your comments below. Meanwhile I'll be talking to some of the organizations listed above — including meeting later this month with the Public Radio Capital folks. I'd like to go into that meeting with encouraging news. Regardless of whatever course we take, it would be good to have their guidance.

By the way, I've posted this here at IT Garage for three reasons: 1) because it's about DIY (do it yourself) technology work, which we'll need in order to make this project happen; 2) it's a sturdy site with a nice comment system; and 3) I've been neglecting it and want to stop doing that.

To answer additional questions about this project and why it's a good idea, here's a Q&A. I'll enlarge and update it as dialog moves forward.

Which won't happen, of course, unless there is a groundswell of interest in the project. So consider this an appeal for news coverage and dialog involving — in alphabetical order —

See you here. And there. And, if all goes well, on the air.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Deal with the system that you already have...

Here in Seattle, both KPLU and KUOW have full-time local news staffs and have a considerable amount of local news inserted during NPR drivetime news programming. I know first-hand that the KPLU news staff is well-organized for dealing with serious breaking news or emergencies.

However, with your case in Santa Barbara, I think you'd be better off trying to reform your current local EAS system, rather than spend the time & money on building and operating a 24/7 non-commercial local news station.

Why isn't your local EAS system more attuned and active with regard to potential fire danger? With a click of a button, every station in your region can be broadcasting the EAS broadcast. Who's minding the store here? Investigating how your EAS system is organized, and applying political pressure to reform it can bring you the results you want.

Nick Francis, Music Director, KPLU

During the recent Angora Ridge fire In Tahoe...

During the Angora fire in Tahoe, we modified the Drupal driven community site run by the University of Nevada's Reynold's School of Journalism about environmental issues facing Tahoe to cover the fire using aggregation. We created an interesting mix of news from the MSM and bloggers as well as images and video users were uploading to Flickr and YouTube.

http://www.ourtahoe.org/angorafire

Bring us News Radio!

After a lifetime as a radio junkie, I have switched to podcasts (I love hearing the good Doc on the TWIT podcasts, by the way!) The main reason I stopped listening to local radio is because local news coverage evaporated. My dream is for us to have a very low budget AM station in town with a strong signal and a LOT of local programming. The thread that would tie everything together would be up-to-the-minute news stories.

I was driving up from Ventura a few hours after the Red Rock fire started, I desperately scanned the FM and AM dial for updates and had a very hard time getting anything but commercial feeds.

We don't need anything fancy, just a lot of local voices and a place to tune after the earth moves or the smoke appears. I'll betcha it'd be very easy to get advertisers. And the local blogging situation assures me that we have a LOT of capable reporters and commentators.

Bring me a folksy version of KFWB or KNX and I'll shelve my iPod and fire up my Grundig.

Good discussion. This is one of my favorite topics.

Don Lubach from the 93111

Local Radio

Great line about the Grundig. Same here.

And you're in 93111? Isn't that where the Painted Cave fire burned through?

local public radio

We do have a local non-commercial community radio station-- KCSB at UCSB, with a strong FM signal: 91.9.
It encourages locals to become broadcasters.
It does not answer the phone 24 hours a day, however.
Once I cell-phoned in a running account of a rapidly moving demonstration and they were ready to make announcements as needed.

And we do need local low power stations, too; this will help community building, which will be important as peak energy etc. go down and relocalization is occurring.
edlaing@silcom.com

KCSB

As I said here, KCSB is terrific and plays an important role, but it is not an "NPR station". Nor should it be.

We need low-power stations too. Unfortunately, the only LPFM granted so far here went to a religious outfit. It will be on 96.9 in Goleta.

Why this focus on an NPR

Why this focus on an NPR style station? I like KCLU and NPR in general, but I don't see a great "local focus" out of KCLU. Most of their programming is from NPR national.

I'm also very skeptical of this personality driven radio that seems to be the seeds of this proposal. Frankly, while I think you make some excellent points regarding information dispersion during an emergency, I think the underlying all of this is movement to give some airtime to the "local celebrities" that have emerged from the News-Press meltdown. Does that make for a sustainable radio station in the longterm?

Does Public Radio Capital require a station to obtain CPB money at some point? Nationally syndicated NPR programming is not cheap (or so KCLU says during their fund drives). The start up costs notwithstanding - how is an NPR-driven station sustainable in the long -term?

I'm also a little puzzled as to why a Pacifica affiliation isn't proposed - or is that too blatantly left-wing?

Between KCSB and Santa Barbara Channels, there seems to be a abundance of opportunities for people to learn about radio and television. I think a bigger question is why do those outlets go underutilized? Do we really need *another* radio station, or would the community be better served by utilizing the facilities that are already available?

Why an NPR station

First, NPR-type stations have listeners. Many are among the top stations in their markets. The best are anchoring institutions in their cities. To achieve that, I think we need to have some NPR programming (and other popular programs from sources like PRI, APM and PRX), but also break the "NPR station" mold by filling the role of a full-service news station. That's what the old KTMS was. That's what the late KEYT tried to be. That's what KZSB ought to be, but isn't. That's what KCLU or KSBX (the local call letters for KCBX) can't be, because they're not here. I give props to KCLU for trying, however. But they just don't have the resources. And their signal, while surprisingly strong for just four watts, is still just a "translator." It's not a local station.

Second, local talent does not necessarily mean local celebrities -- though in some cases it could. Look at it this way: there are two holes in Santa Barbara. One is for a substantial local "NPR station". The other is for a full-service news station. We can combine those two. That's what I'm proposing here.

Third, I don't know what Public Radio Capital requires, exactly. I'll find out. I doubt, however, that it's necessary to get CPB money in any case. Yes, NPR programming has costs, which are based on market size and number of listeners. Whatever they are, stations find ways to pay them. (And other suppliers.) We're not a big market, but we are a relatively affluent one. I'm sure we -- as listeners, and not just as wealthy sponsors -- can pay. Also, as I said in the piece above, there are efforts afoot to reduce the friction involved in the listener-payment process, and increase involvement of listeners as "members" of stations. I think a new station in Santa Barbara, with no legacy membership system to maintain, would be an excellent "clean slate" for testing out some of these new ideas.

Fourth, yes, Pacifica is too blatantly left-wing. There is no way of satisfying everybody, but I think a news-oriented public station would become popular as well as essential in times when hard news breaks. As a Republican friend in Utah once told me, "everybody wants the roads fixed."

I think KCSB and other institutions are good at what they do. But they don't fill this particular bill. We need a news station. And we need our own NPR-type public radio station. Can we combine both? I don't know. But I'd like to try.

Re: Why NPR?

I think KCLU and KCBX are perfect examples of why the news coverage you're looking for simply does not fit the NPR mold. Neither station provides extensive local coverage in their own communities. They rely HEAVILY on nationally syndicated programming. Didn't KCLU practically eliminate all locally produced programming - save the late night music shows and the five minute news segments?

Look at KCLU's website - local content is NOT a significant part of their focus. All local news (and I don't know if what they have on their site qualifies at "local news") is located at the bottom of the page in the lower right-hand corner. 80% of what they do ON THEIR WEBSITE is from national. Certainly, there a good reasons for that, or else they'd change it.

I know of no NPR station, even in large markets like New York or Los Angeles, that have extensive local news coverage. Please correct me if I am wrong, but I really think that is telling. Look at KCRW - certainly a rogue NPR station if there ever was one - and even their site is predominately national.

Look - I certainly think your intentions are noble, so please don't misunderstand my criticisms. My attitude about locally produced media is "the more the merrier". But I don't think the NPR model you are proposing is sustainable in the long-term.

I would LOVE to be wrong about that, BTW.

Emergency Public Information

The 2005-2006 Santa Barbara County Civil Grand Jury studied this issue and wrote a report on it: http://www.sbcgj.org/2006/EmergencyPublicInfo.pdf

Milt Hess

Santa Barbara Grand Jury report

Excellent. Thanks, Milt.

Here's a link to it.

And here's the money quote:

Radio and television stations in the past have been reliable sources of emergency information within Santa Barbara County. Residents were able to tune to a local radio station or turn on the television and hear and see emergency events occurring and get up-to-date information on what they should do and how to avoid areas where emergencies were occurring. The Grand Jury found that this is no longer the case. Santa Barbara County has no single designated 24-hour radio station that residents can tune to for accurate updated emergency information. In contrast, the County of Ventura has an agreement with one designated radio station to act as its primary source of emergency information for the general public. A hotline has been installed in the Ventura County Emergency Operations Center that goes directly to the radio station, providing fast broadcast of updated and accurate information to its residents.

Santa Barbara County’s local media networks have been consolidated or purchased by large outside network companies, many of which use prerecorded broadcasting and have reduced or no staff on duty during most of the 24-hour day. Often County emergency public information personnel at the scene of an event will send out an emergency news alert to the news media which may result in limited or no response. This adversely affects the ability of emergency personnel to notify the general public of major events affecting them and increases the anxiety and confusion of the public. Events like the La Conchita earth-slide and the 2005 Gaviota fire were examples of this problem. The public was uninformed and confused due to the lack of timely and accurate information about evacuations and highway closures.

Reverse 911 and low power utility radio (which the report recommends) won't cut it. When an emergency hits, people want to turn to a reliable news source — a local broadcast institution that can gather information and get it out when it's needed. Commercial radio has failed us here. Public radio, I think, is the only way. And there's an opportunity, right now, to pursue that avenue.

Lighting a fire for public radio in SB

I felt the same way when I was watching HGTV and a tsunami alert scrolled across the screen. I turned to our local TV station & local radio stations & couldn't find any info. If it had been a weekday morning I would have tuned in to KTYD as they are VERY good at keeping the public informed. As this was in the evening & I didn't want to go to sleep w/o knowing what was going on I headed slowly for Goleta Beach by car, but it is w/in walking distance from our home, all the way watching for signs of animals fleeing or anything else. Good luck w/ the campaign!