Through a series of coincidi, I was introduced to IPcop. It's a very well done, dead simple, linux distribution customized to be a firewall.

Setup is about as easy as any standard Linux install. Tell it which ethernet cards are which, the particulars of your network addressing, and you're done.

You'll probably never have to deal with Linux, or the command line. Management of the box is done through a web browser. Forwarding ports is dead easy. It supports multiple external addresses, so we can use it to handle traffic from both internet connections. The update process is painless as well.

I was listening to Doc on a recent podcast, and he mentioned this site, and the need to figure out just what to do with it. Podcasting would be interesting for one use.

I'm writing this to suggest another use as well. I belong to APCU, the Chicago based computer club. We lead our meetings with something we call "Random Access", which is a group discussion where we try to help each other out with the technical issues which we can't figure out on our own.

Even in the age of Google, Technorati, etc... there is still a need for this form of interaction. Perhaps we could do something like that here, we'd need to focus on one subject at a time to maintain the flow.

Not quite sure why I would need to blog on somebody else's web site.

Talking identity shop at a Berkman meeting here at Harvard. Johannes Ernst has a list of attendees.

Kim Cameron: I run my blog on a LAMP stack... Now Kim, the lead Architect for Identity at Microsoft, is talking about hacking PHP in Wordpress. These involve about 100 lines of PHP that he'd like to submit to the WordPress project. He adds, We're looking for a partner to do an InfoCard on the Mac, and on Linux.

InfoCard is not in this case a Microsoft program, but "a type of visualization." Of which the first example is the Microsoft Identity Selector known as InfoCard. So the term InfoCard is a bit of nomenclatural camouflage here.

First, go read Terry Heaton's The Ammunition Business. Terry's been whupping the TV industry with a clue stick for years. I don't know how much effect he having, but I also don't know anybody who's better at it.

So, a big Amen for what Terry is saying.

Now, here are a few more points I don't see many (or, any) people talking about. So I'll lay them out here, because the underlying theme is pure DIY. If I'm wrong about anything, correct me. This is mostly new stuff.

First, if LCD screen price/feature trends continue in their same general down/up directions, by the end of this year, we'll see 1080i and 1080p HD flat screens for under $1k at Costco and the big box electronics stores. (For what it's worth, folks at Sony and Sharp told me at CES that they expect resolution improvement to plateau for awhile at 1080p as a maximum resolution.)

Now, where will the best-looking source video for those screens come from?

Cable? Satellite?

They don't have the bandwidth, because they're wedging too many broadcast channels in a pipeline of finite width. Even at 720 "HD" resolution they're full of artifacts. I was at Circuit City the other day, watching some golf on ESPN-HD or some channel like that. A shot following a golf ball through the sky looked like a tiny black donut moving through a field of shimmering rectangles. Any frame looked like a .jpg saved at "lowest".

Direct over-the-air digital transmission (where all the analog TV stations are moving — all stations will be off the 2-13 VHF band and transmitting in HD on the UHF band) is capable of relatively artifact-free tranmission (because the stations don't have the burden of carrying 500 channels), but who bothers with a TV antenna anymore? HD stations look to me like anachronisms at birth. Expensive ones, too.

No, the best-looking source video will be produced by the same people who own the screens. Sony's HD cameras make very pretty pictures, at 1080i. (Can they do 1080p yet? Need to check.)

I already know of people whose main uses for big flat screens in their homes are personal photos and home movies. That's probably what we'll do too, when we move to our next house.

New standards for DVDs are in dispute, and may end up splitting the baby. Meaning, we're stuck with prettified

Watch Apple. Count on them going all-out with video production enablement for amateurs, and -- count on it -- distribution through uploads and downloads from the great .Mac in the sky.

And, of course, others will follow.

Here's the kicker.

Most of my writing goes in one of four places: Linux Journal, SuitWatch (some of which also runs in LJ), here in IT Garage, or my blog. So when I write something I want to find again, I'm not always sure where it ran.

This morning I wanted to find a piece where I quoted Terry Heaton about unbundling. That brought up a goose egg on Google. So did leaving my name out of the search. I got farther with Terry Heaton and Unbundled, but not to what I wrote about the subject.

So I looked around my hard drives and found a draft of the piece, with the phrase "This morning, fortuitously". The top result on Google got me to —

Doc Searls' IT Garage - 5:08am
This morning, fortuitously, he treats us to some important wisdom in 2006: The
Unbundled Awakening. Here are the core paragraphs: ...
itgarage.com/ - 28k - Cached - Similar pages - Remove result

Which was helpful, because I could read the cached page and then locate it in IT Garage.

But there was no direct link to the original piece.

Yahoo brought many more results, all around IT Garage, but nothing on the first page pointing sraight to the piece.

So I tried some Live Web engines.

While some of the engines found nothing, Blogpulse, Google Blogsearch and Technorati each found exactly what I was looking for.

These results highlight the differences between the Static Web and the Live Web (which I first wrote about in Searching the World Live Web, in Suitwatch and Linux Journal).

First, read the post below, with all the comments. Read Jeremy Wright's post on the matter.

Then read Dave Winer's How to reform the VC industry.

Dave's case compresses to these two points:

1. One word: disintermediate. Take out the middleman. We don’t need the partners, limited or general, they gum up the works. We need money to start new ventures. Luckily we know the people with the money, they’re the users. And we need people to validate the ideas. Same people, the users.

In Open Source Radioware, I wrote about Rivendell and other open source software systerms for running radio stations, from Salem Radio Labs.

After reading that, Web-Tones writes,

I have yet to find an open source legal platform that would allow the same thing, but if it is not currently "out there", it most assuredly is coming soon to a theater near you. These offerings have the potential of changing the rules of the game for small to medium size law firms. A low cost, high impact, legal computing platform could be quite disruptive, allowing smaller players to fish in ponds that they were previously excluded from. Given that traditionally, the larger the organization, the slower it adapts, significant "first mover" advantages might be there for the taking. Already competitively priced commercial offerings that rely heavily on open source technologies are starting to point the way in the knowledge management space.

So I'm wondering if things haven't already moved farther than Web-Tones knows.

Dave Kearns makes a good point about DRM: It's immoral in itself, because it can be used for good or bad purposes.

So far, almost all the discussion about DRM has been confined to digital rights management by large companies. We've said almost nothing, so far, about individuals. Here's what Dave says:

One of the better uses of DRM could be within the realm of user-centric Identity Management. After all, this movement is all about personal control of identity attributes. That is, people are in search of ways to not only control who gets initial access to reading those attributes but also what they do with that data after reading it. DRM is a technology which promises to deliver that benefit, if only those who most passionately support user-centric IdM would realize it.

Sometimes Linuxheads can be Nasty to So-called Stupid People says D. Morgan, quoted in an AlwaysOn piece posted by somebodey else. Morgan's item is one among zillions in the very long Cluetrain Manifesto signer's page. I suppose the writer who posted it has a problem with The Cluetrain Manifesto (a six year old book and a seven-year-old website), Linux geeks, or both.

So I thought I'd look and see if the Linux newbie-bashing problem is still around. I couldn't find anything, but also didn't look very hard.

In fact, following that last link, I found many sites that are quite helpful to newbies.